Rwanda vs Uganda: Drained organic soils — Area, per capita
Rwanda
0.0025 ha per person
in 2024
Uganda
0.0024 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
43rd
Uganda rank
44th
Drained organic soils — Area, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Uganda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0025 ha per person against 0.0024 ha per person in Uganda, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 43rd and Uganda ranks 44th of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.005 ha per person | 0.0059 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0.0041 ha per person | 0.0044 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0.0032 ha per person | 0.0032 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.0026 ha per person | 0.0025 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per capita, Rwanda or Uganda?
- Rwanda, at 0.0025 ha per person against 0.0024 ha per person in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per capita between Rwanda and Uganda?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 43rd and Uganda ranks 44th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.