Belgium vs Costa Rica: Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Costa Rica
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
77th
Costa Rica rank
74th
Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.5 times Belgium's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 74th of 186 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Costa Rica?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Costa Rica?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Costa Rica rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 74th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.