Brazil vs China: Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Brazil
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Brazil rank
85th
China rank
83rd
Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Brazil, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 85th and China ranks 83rd of 186 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Brazil or China?
- China, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Brazil and China?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Brazil ranks 85th and China ranks 83rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.