Eritrea vs Uruguay: Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Uruguay
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
55th
Uruguay rank
53rd
Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Eritrea's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 55th and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uruguay?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Uruguay rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 55th and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.