Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Serbia rank
89th
Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Serbia ranks 89th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Serbia ranks 89th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.