Latvia vs Zambia: Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
7th
Zambia rank
5th
Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Zambia's figure about 3.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Zambia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 5th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.