Bangladesh vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Drained organic soils (CO2) — Emissions

Bangladesh
17,384 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
43,747 kt
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
13th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
16th

Drained organic soils (CO2) — Emissions over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 43,747 kt against 17,384 kt in Bangladesh, a difference of 26,363 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.5 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 221 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 18,162 kt 43,298 kt 25,136 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 17,765 kt 44,002 kt 26,236 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 17,632 kt 44,282 kt 26,649 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 17,513 kt 43,779 kt 26,266 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drained organic soils (co2) — emissions, Bangladesh or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 43,747 kt against 17,384 kt in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in drained organic soils (co2) — emissions between Bangladesh and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
26,363 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for drained organic soils (co2) — emissions?
Bangladesh ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils (CO2) — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Drained organic soils (CO2) — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-co2-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/bangladesh/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-co2-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/bangladesh/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Bangladesh vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Drained organic soils (CO2) — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Drained organic soils (CO2) — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf