Brazil vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate (CO2)

Brazil
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
2nd
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
1st

Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate (CO2) over time

  • Brazil
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
051015199120072024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Brazil ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 1st of 116 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1.77 % change on previous year 0.1498 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year Brazil
2000s 1.77 % change on previous year 0.0104 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year Brazil
2010s 0.233 % change on previous year -0.057 % change on previous year 0.2901 % change on previous year Brazil
2020s 0.3404 % change on previous year -0.084 % change on previous year 0.4244 % change on previous year Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drained organic soils — emissions (co2), annual growth rate, Brazil or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Brazil, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in drained organic soils — emissions (co2), annual growth rate between Brazil and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
0 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for drained organic soils — emissions (co2), annual growth rate?
Brazil ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 1st of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-emissions-co2-annual-growth-rate/brazil/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-emissions-co2-annual-growth-rate/brazil/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Brazil vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
148 places, 4,811 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Drained organic soils — Emissions (CO2). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.