Japan vs Rwanda: Drained organic soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O)
Japan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2024
Japan rank
45th
Rwanda rank
44th
Drained organic soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O) over time
- Japan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Japan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 44th of 189 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — emissions (n2o), per capita, Japan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — emissions (n2o), per capita between Japan and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Rwanda rank globally for drained organic soils — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Japan ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 44th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.