Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Norway: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2,273 kt
in 2023
Norway
1,021 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th
Norway rank
19th

Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Norway
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 2,273 kt against 1,021 kt in Norway, a difference of 1,252 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.2 times Norway's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Norway ranks 19th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 2,281 kt 955.55 kt 1,326 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2,312 kt 976.74 kt 1,335 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2,317 kt 1,012 kt 1,306 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2,277 kt 1,022 kt 1,256 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Norway?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 2,273 kt against 1,021 kt in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Norway?
1,252 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Norway?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Norway rank globally for drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Norway ranks 19th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Norway: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-n2o-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-n2o-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/norway/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Norway: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf