Belgium-Luxembourg vs Portugal: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 41.18 kt against 38.98 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 2.2 kt.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 62nd and Portugal ranks 61st of 221 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Belgium-Luxembourg or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 41.18 kt against 38.98 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Belgium-Luxembourg and Portugal?
- 2.2 kt, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Portugal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Portugal rank globally for drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 62nd and Portugal ranks 61st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf