Latin America and the Caribbean vs Papua New Guinea: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Latin America and the Caribbean
2,216 kt
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
1,034 kt
in 2023
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
21st
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd

Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199020062023

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 2,216 kt against 1,034 kt in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1,182 kt.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 2.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 21st and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 33 groups.

Latin America and the Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 2,086 kt 898.39 kt 1,187 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2000s 2,153 kt 1,050 kt 1,104 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2010s 2,181 kt 1,003 kt 1,177 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2020s 2,212 kt 1,029 kt 1,183 kt Latin America and the Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Latin America and the Caribbean or Papua New Guinea?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 2,216 kt against 1,034 kt in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Latin America and the Caribbean and Papua New Guinea?
1,182 kt, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and Papua New Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean and Papua New Guinea rank globally for drained organic soils (n2o) — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 21st and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean vs Papua New Guinea: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-n2o-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/drained-organic-soils-n2o-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/papua-new-guinea/">Latin America and the Caribbean vs Papua New Guinea: Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Drained organic soils (N2O) — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
290 places, 9,635 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf