American Samoa vs Equatorial Guinea: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita

American Samoa
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2024
American Samoa rank
135th
Equatorial Guinea rank
136th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita over time

  • American Samoa
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000200020122024

How they compare

American Samoa currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

American Samoa ranks 135th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th of 202 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita, American Samoa or Equatorial Guinea?
American Samoa, at 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita between American Samoa and Equatorial Guinea?
0 terawatt-hours per person, with American Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Equatorial Guinea?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do American Samoa and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita?
American Samoa ranks 135th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Equatorial Guinea: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-capita/american-samoa/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-capita/american-samoa/equatorial-guinea/">American Samoa vs Equatorial Guinea: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita
Unit
terawatt-hours per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,636 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.