Gabon vs India: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita
Gabon
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2024
India
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2025
Gabon rank
111th
India rank
109th
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita over time
- Gabon
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Gabon, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Gabon ranks 111th and India ranks 109th of 202 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita, Gabon or India?
- India, at 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita between Gabon and India?
- 0 terawatt-hours per person, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and India?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gabon and India rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita?
- Gabon ranks 111th and India ranks 109th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.