Kiribati vs Mongolia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of GDP

Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mongolia
0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Kiribati rank
138th
Mongolia rank
135th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of GDP over time

  • Kiribati
  • Mongolia
0000200020122025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in Kiribati, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 138th and Mongolia ranks 135th of 198 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP Mongolia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP Mongolia
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of gdp, Kiribati or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of gdp between Kiribati and Mongolia?
0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mongolia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Mongolia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of gdp?
Kiribati ranks 138th and Mongolia ranks 135th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Mongolia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/mongolia/">Kiribati vs Mongolia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per unit of GDP
Unit
terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,413 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.