Ecuador vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Ecuador
2,423 kt
in 2050
Lao People's Democratic Republic
2,224 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
36th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
38th

Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Ecuador
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196120052050

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,423 kt against 2,224 kt in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 199 kt.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Ecuador ranks 36th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 38th of 215 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 658.4 kt 2,127 kt 1,469 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
1970s 606.43 kt 1,783 kt 1,176 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
1980s 1,121 kt 1,826 kt 705.64 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
1990s 2,061 kt 1,674 kt 386.57 kt Ecuador
2000s 2,237 kt 2,115 kt 122.2 kt Ecuador
2010s 2,110 kt 2,544 kt 434.14 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 2,007 kt 2,435 kt 428.01 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2030s 2,419 kt 2,241 kt 178.03 kt Ecuador
2050s 2,423 kt 2,224 kt 198.61 kt Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Ecuador or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Ecuador, at 2,423 kt against 2,224 kt in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Ecuador and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
199 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Ecuador ranks 36th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 38th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/ecuador/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/ecuador/lao-pdr/">Ecuador vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,483 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf