Costa Rica vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) (N2O CO2eq)

Costa Rica
623.33 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo
604.81 kt
in 2050
Costa Rica rank
108th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
111th

Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) (N2O CO2eq) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0200400600800196120052050

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 623.33 kt against 604.81 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 18.52 kt.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 108th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 111th of 232 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 8 and Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 122.41 kt 72.85 kt 49.56 kt Costa Rica
1970s 207.97 kt 117.66 kt 90.31 kt Costa Rica
1980s 311.52 kt 152.33 kt 159.19 kt Costa Rica
1990s 437.31 kt 201.67 kt 235.64 kt Costa Rica
2000s 380.14 kt 190.47 kt 189.67 kt Costa Rica
2010s 500.66 kt 456.56 kt 44.1 kt Costa Rica
2020s 471.39 kt 619.72 kt 148.33 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2030s 534.27 kt 325.71 kt 208.55 kt Costa Rica
2050s 623.33 kt 604.81 kt 18.52 kt Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Costa Rica or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Costa Rica, at 623.33 kt against 604.81 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Costa Rica and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
18.52 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Costa Rica and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Costa Rica ranks 108th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 111th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Costa Rica vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,479 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf