Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Emissions from crops: Emissions (CO2eq) … CO2eq square kilometre N2O

Barbados
0.0018 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
101st
Zimbabwe rank
104th

Emissions from crops: Emissions (CO2eq) … CO2eq square kilometre N2O over time

  • Barbados
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0018 kt per square kilometre against 0.0017 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 176 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0431 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0424 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.024 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0227 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.0214 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0198 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.0224 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0207 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0171 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0158 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0077 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0066 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square, Barbados or Zimbabwe?
Barbados, at 0.0018 kt per square kilometre against 0.0017 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square between Barbados and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square?
Barbados ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/barbados/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/barbados/zimbabwe/">Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,960 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.