Cuba vs Iceland: Emissions from crops: Emissions (CO2eq) … CO2eq square kilometre N2O

Cuba
0.0006 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
132nd
Iceland rank
135th

Emissions from crops: Emissions (CO2eq) … CO2eq square kilometre N2O over time

  • Cuba
  • Iceland
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0006 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 132nd and Iceland ranks 135th of 176 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.006 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0094 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0086 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.016 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0153 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0073 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square, Cuba or Iceland?
Cuba, at 0.0006 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square between Cuba and Iceland?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Iceland rank globally for emissions from crops — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square?
Cuba ranks 132nd and Iceland ranks 135th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Iceland: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-crops-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/iceland/">Cuba vs Iceland: Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,960 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.