Australia and New Zealand vs Martinique: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
10.23 % change on previous year
in 2023
Martinique
8.98 % change on previous year
in 2006
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Martinique rank
10th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Martinique
-20-10010196219922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 10.23 % change on previous year against 8.98 % change on previous year in Martinique, a difference of 1.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Martinique's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Martinique ranks 10th of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Martinique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Martinique Difference Ahead
1960s 2.07 % change on previous year -3.1 % change on previous year 5.17 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.0581 % change on previous year 1.98 % change on previous year 1.92 % change on previous year Martinique
1980s -0.1388 % change on previous year -3.24 % change on previous year 3.1 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1990s -0.2825 % change on previous year -3.37 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2000s -0.2083 % change on previous year -2.03 % change on previous year 1.82 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Martinique?
Australia and New Zealand, at 10.23 % change on previous year against 8.98 % change on previous year in Martinique as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Martinique?
1.25 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Martinique?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Martinique rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Martinique ranks 10th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Martinique: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-annual-growth-rate-2/australia-and-new-zealand/martinique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-annual-growth-rate-2/australia-and-new-zealand/martinique/">Australia and New Zealand vs Martinique: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 13,954 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.