Myanmar vs Sudan: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4)
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Myanmar
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 1,809 kt against 1,614 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 195 kt.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 18th of 228 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,104 kt | 1,807 kt | 703.31 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 747.48 kt | 1,819 kt | 1,072 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions, Myanmar or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 1,809 kt against 1,614 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions between Myanmar and Sudan?
- 195 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Sudan rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 18th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf