China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
15.49 kt
in 2050
Kiribati
20.05 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
189th
Kiribati rank
188th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Kiribati
050100150196120052050

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 20.05 kt against 15.49 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 4.56 kt.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Kiribati ranks 188th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 8 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 107.71 kt 5.35 kt 102.36 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 144.19 kt 5.48 kt 138.71 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 132.72 kt 5.61 kt 127.11 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 57.54 kt 5.6 kt 51.94 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 50.74 kt 7.68 kt 43.07 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 46.26 kt 9.16 kt 37.1 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 47.46 kt 9.89 kt 37.57 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 13.7 kt 13.23 kt 0.4757 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 15.49 kt 20.05 kt 4.56 kt Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 20.05 kt against 15.49 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
4.56 kt, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Kiribati ranks 188th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf