Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Australia and New Zealand
118,756 kt
in 2050
Mexico
79,444 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Mexico rank
11th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mexico
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 118,756 kt against 79,444 kt in Mexico, a difference of 39,312 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Mexico's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Mexico ranks 11th of 195 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 104,248 kt 38,205 kt 66,043 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 121,814 kt 47,564 kt 74,250 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 111,063 kt 58,461 kt 52,602 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 110,629 kt 59,383 kt 51,246 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 106,488 kt 59,789 kt 46,698 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 99,423 kt 63,721 kt 35,702 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 94,064 kt 68,383 kt 25,682 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 116,817 kt 71,748 kt 45,069 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 118,756 kt 79,444 kt 39,312 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Australia and New Zealand or Mexico?
Australia and New Zealand, at 118,756 kt against 79,444 kt in Mexico as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
39,312 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mexico rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Mexico ranks 11th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf