Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Norway: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,278 kt
in 2050
Norway
3,147 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
121st
Norway rank
123rd

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Norway
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 3,278 kt against 3,147 kt in Norway, a difference of 131 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 121st and Norway ranks 123rd of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 1,155 kt 3,628 kt 2,473 kt Norway
1970s 1,500 kt 3,085 kt 1,585 kt Norway
1980s 1,755 kt 3,195 kt 1,440 kt Norway
1990s 1,877 kt 3,184 kt 1,307 kt Norway
2000s 1,470 kt 2,984 kt 1,513 kt Norway
2010s 1,668 kt 2,779 kt 1,111 kt Norway
2020s 2,217 kt 2,754 kt 537.58 kt Norway
2030s 2,174 kt 3,077 kt 902.23 kt Norway
2050s 3,278 kt 3,147 kt 130.77 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Norway?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 3,278 kt against 3,147 kt in Norway as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Norway?
131 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Norway?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Norway rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 121st and Norway ranks 123rd of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Norway: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/norway/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Norway: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf