Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Tunisia: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,278 kt
in 2050
Tunisia
3,505 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
121st
Tunisia rank
119th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Tunisia
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k3.5k196120052050

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3,505 kt against 3,278 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 227 kt.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 119th of 228 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,155 kt 1,795 kt 640.3 kt Tunisia
1970s 1,500 kt 2,145 kt 644.88 kt Tunisia
1980s 1,755 kt 1,972 kt 217.46 kt Tunisia
1990s 1,877 kt 2,347 kt 469.57 kt Tunisia
2000s 1,470 kt 2,592 kt 1,121 kt Tunisia
2010s 1,668 kt 2,425 kt 756.88 kt Tunisia
2020s 2,217 kt 2,290 kt 73.28 kt Tunisia
2030s 2,174 kt 3,216 kt 1,042 kt Tunisia
2050s 3,278 kt 3,505 kt 226.53 kt Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3,505 kt against 3,278 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Tunisia?
227 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Tunisia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Tunisia rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 119th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Tunisia: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/tunisia/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Tunisia: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf