Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Zimbabwe: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
11,823 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
11,912 kt
in 2050
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
56th
Zimbabwe rank
55th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 11,912 kt against 11,823 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 89 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 56th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) averaged higher in 8 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 11,446 kt 3,891 kt 7,555 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1970s 14,023 kt 6,059 kt 7,964 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1980s 16,847 kt 5,818 kt 11,029 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1990s 15,428 kt 5,729 kt 9,699 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s 13,194 kt 6,001 kt 7,194 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 13,741 kt 6,326 kt 7,415 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 12,763 kt 6,509 kt 6,254 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2030s 12,586 kt 8,982 kt 3,603 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2050s 11,823 kt 11,912 kt 88.6 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 11,912 kt against 11,823 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe?
89 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 56th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Zimbabwe: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/zimbabwe/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Zimbabwe: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf