Australia vs Martinique: Emissions from livestock … N2O CO2eq annual growth rate

Australia
14.73 % change on previous year
in 2023
Martinique
20.5 % change on previous year
in 2006
Australia rank
4th
Martinique rank
1st

Emissions from livestock … N2O CO2eq annual growth rate over time

  • Australia
  • Martinique
-20020196219922023

How they compare

Martinique currently reports 20.5 % change on previous year against 14.73 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 5.77 % change on previous year.

That makes Martinique's figure about 1.4 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 4th and Martinique ranks 1st of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Martinique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Martinique Difference Ahead
1960s 1.91 % change on previous year -2.39 % change on previous year 4.29 % change on previous year Australia
1970s -0.1183 % change on previous year 1.7 % change on previous year 1.82 % change on previous year Martinique
1980s 0.1893 % change on previous year -2.26 % change on previous year 2.45 % change on previous year Australia
1990s -0.7999 % change on previous year -2.73 % change on previous year 1.93 % change on previous year Australia
2000s -0.6871 % change on previous year -1.82 % change on previous year 1.13 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, annual growth, Australia or Martinique?
Martinique, at 20.5 % change on previous year against 14.73 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2006.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, annual growth between Australia and Martinique?
5.77 % change on previous year, with Martinique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Martinique?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do Australia and Martinique rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, annual growth?
Australia ranks 4th and Martinique ranks 1st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Martinique: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-annual-growth-rate/australia/martinique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-annual-growth-rate/australia/martinique/">Australia vs Martinique: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 13,954 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.