Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions, Nauru or Tokelau?

Nauru, at 0.0015 kt against 0.0008 kt in Tokelau as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tokelau?

65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nauru vs Tokelau: Emissions from livestock — Emissions

Nauru

0.0015 kt

in 2050

Tokelau

0.0008 kt

in 2050

Nauru rank

226th

Tokelau rank

228th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions over time

Nauru
Tokelau

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.0015 kt against 0.0008 kt in Tokelau, a difference of 0.0007 kt.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.9 times Tokelau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 226th and Tokelau ranks 228th of 228 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nauru	Tokelau	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 kt	0.0002 kt	0.0001 kt	Nauru
1970s	0.0004 kt	0.0003 kt	0.0001 kt	Nauru
1980s	0.0006 kt	0.0003 kt	0.0003 kt	Nauru
1990s	0.0008 kt	0.0003 kt	0.0005 kt	Nauru
2000s	0.0008 kt	0.0003 kt	0.0005 kt	Nauru
2010s	0.0008 kt	0.0003 kt	0.0005 kt	Nauru
2020s	0.0008 kt	0.0008 kt	0 kt	—
2030s	0.0012 kt	0.0005 kt	0.0007 kt	Nauru
2050s	0.0015 kt	0.0008 kt	0.0007 kt	Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions, Nauru or Tokelau?: Nauru, at 0.0015 kt against 0.0008 kt in Tokelau as of 2050.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions between Nauru and Tokelau?: 0.0007 kt, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tokelau?: 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Nauru and Tokelau rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions?: Nauru ranks 226th and Tokelau ranks 228th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Tokelau: Emissions from livestock — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/nauru/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/nauru/tokelau/">Nauru vs Tokelau: Emissions from livestock — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf