Antigua and Barbuda vs Sri Lanka: Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre (CH4)

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0011 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0011 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
75th
Sri Lanka rank
78th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre (CH4) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Sri Lanka
0.0010.0020.0020.0030.003196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0011 kt per square kilometre against 0.0011 kt per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 78th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Sri Lanka?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0011 kt per square kilometre against 0.0011 kt per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Sri Lanka?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sri Lanka rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 78th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Sri Lanka: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-per-square-kilometre-2/antigua-and-barbuda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-per-square-kilometre-2/antigua-and-barbuda/sri-lanka/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Sri Lanka: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.