Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
146th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
147th

Emissions from livestock — Emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
000000196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mauritania ranks 146th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 147th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions from livestock — emissions, per square kilometre, Mauritania or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mauritania, at 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions from livestock — emissions, per square kilometre between Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emissions from livestock — emissions, per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 146th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 147th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-per-square-kilometre-2/mauritania/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-from-livestock-emissions-per-square-kilometre-2/mauritania/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emissions from livestock — Emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.