Belgium-Luxembourg vs Benin: Emissions on agricultural: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual
Belgium-Luxembourg
3.57 % change on previous year
in 1999
Benin
3.89 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
33rd
Benin rank
31st
Emissions on agricultural: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Benin
How they compare
Benin currently reports 3.89 % change on previous year against 3.57 % change on previous year in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 0.32 % change on previous year.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 33rd and Benin ranks 31st of 244 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emissions on agricultural land — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Belgium-Luxembourg or Benin?
- Benin, at 3.89 % change on previous year against 3.57 % change on previous year in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in emissions on agricultural land — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Belgium-Luxembourg and Benin?
- 0.32 % change on previous year, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Benin?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Benin rank globally for emissions on agricultural land — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 33rd and Benin ranks 31st of 244 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.