Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per capita

Australia and New Zealand
8.65 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Belarus
7.68 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
10th
Belarus rank
12th

Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per capita over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belarus
051015199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 8.65 t CO2eq/cap against 7.68 t CO2eq/cap in Belarus, a difference of 0.97 t CO2eq/cap.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 12th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Belarus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 13.12 t CO2eq/cap 7.63 t CO2eq/cap 5.49 t CO2eq/cap Australia and New Zealand
2000s 12.56 t CO2eq/cap 7.25 t CO2eq/cap 5.31 t CO2eq/cap Australia and New Zealand
2010s 8.27 t CO2eq/cap 7.62 t CO2eq/cap 0.651 t CO2eq/cap Australia and New Zealand
2020s 6.68 t CO2eq/cap 7.57 t CO2eq/cap 0.8925 t CO2eq/cap Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions on agricultural land — emissions per capita, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
Australia and New Zealand, at 8.65 t CO2eq/cap against 7.68 t CO2eq/cap in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions on agricultural land — emissions per capita between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
0.97 t CO2eq/cap, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for emissions on agricultural land — emissions per capita?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 12th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-on-agricultural-land-emissions-per-capita/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-on-agricultural-land-emissions-per-capita/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per capita
Unit
t CO2eq/cap
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,042 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.