China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per value of agricultural

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.33 kg CO2eq/Int$
in 2023
Kiribati
0.43 kg CO2eq/Int$
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
181st
Kiribati rank
178th

Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per value of agricultural over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Kiribati
0.20.30.40.50.60.7199020062023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.43 kg CO2eq/Int$ against 0.33 kg CO2eq/Int$ in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.1 kg CO2eq/Int$.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 181st and Kiribati ranks 178th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0.584 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.268 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.316 kg CO2eq/Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.542 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.349 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.193 kg CO2eq/Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.507 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.391 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.116 kg CO2eq/Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.3 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.445 kg CO2eq/Int$ 0.145 kg CO2eq/Int$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emissions on agricultural land — emissions per value of agricultural, China, Hong Kong SAR or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.43 kg CO2eq/Int$ against 0.33 kg CO2eq/Int$ in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in emissions on agricultural land — emissions per value of agricultural between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
0.1 kg CO2eq/Int$, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati rank globally for emissions on agricultural land — emissions per value of agricultural?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 181st and Kiribati ranks 178th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per value of agricultural production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per value of agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-on-agricultural-land-emissions-per-value-of-agricultural-production/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/emissions-on-agricultural-land-emissions-per-value-of-agricultural-production/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per value of agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emissions on agricultural land — Emissions per value of agricultural production
Unit
kg CO2eq/Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
235 places, 7,692 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.