Armenia vs Congo: Energy — Emissions
Energy — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 6,940 kt against 6,270 kt in Armenia, a difference of 670 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 122nd and Congo ranks 119th of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,246 kt | 3,729 kt | 482.5 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 3,999 kt | 4,178 kt | 179 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 5,451 kt | 5,665 kt | 214 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 6,462 kt | 6,960 kt | 497.5 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions, Armenia or Congo?
- Congo, at 6,940 kt against 6,270 kt in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions between Armenia and Congo?
- 670 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Congo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Congo rank globally for energy — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 122nd and Congo ranks 119th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf