Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Holy See: Energy — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
15 kt
in 2023
Holy See
13.5 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
197th
Holy See rank
198th

Energy — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Holy See
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 15 kt against 13.5 kt in Holy See, a difference of 1.5 kt.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 1.1 times Holy See's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Holy See ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 197th and Holy See ranks 198th of 200 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 1 and Holy See in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Holy See Difference Ahead
1960s 0.408 kt 14.1 kt 13.69 kt Holy See
1970s 0.0005 kt 19.05 kt 19.05 kt Holy See
1980s 4.4 kt 17.4 kt 13 kt Holy See
1990s 9.9 kt 17.57 kt 7.67 kt Holy See
2000s 11 kt 18.01 kt 7.01 kt Holy See
2010s 11.74 kt 16.04 kt 4.3 kt Holy See
2020s 15.62 kt 13.82 kt 1.8 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Holy See?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 15 kt against 13.5 kt in Holy See as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Holy See?
1.5 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Holy See?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Holy See rank globally for energy — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 197th and Holy See ranks 198th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Holy See: Energy — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/holy-see/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/holy-see/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Holy See: Energy — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf