Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Kiribati: Energy — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
15 kt
in 2023
Kiribati
68 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
197th
Kiribati rank
193rd

Energy — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Kiribati
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 68 kt against 15 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 53 kt.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 4.5 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 197th and Kiribati ranks 193rd of 200 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0.408 kt 15.88 kt 15.47 kt Kiribati
1970s 0.0005 kt 28.24 kt 28.24 kt Kiribati
1980s 4.4 kt 23.46 kt 19.06 kt Kiribati
1990s 9.9 kt 27.48 kt 17.58 kt Kiribati
2000s 11 kt 42.92 kt 31.92 kt Kiribati
2010s 11.74 kt 58.3 kt 46.56 kt Kiribati
2020s 15.62 kt 65.22 kt 49.6 kt Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 68 kt against 15 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Kiribati?
53 kt, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Kiribati rank globally for energy — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 197th and Kiribati ranks 193rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Kiribati: Energy — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/kiribati/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Kiribati: Energy — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf