Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Monaco: Energy — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
15 kt
in 2023
Monaco
52 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
197th
Monaco rank
196th

Energy — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Monaco
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 52 kt against 15 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 37 kt.

That makes Monaco's figure about 3.5 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 197th and Monaco ranks 196th of 200 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Monaco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.408 kt 99.91 kt 99.5 kt Monaco
1970s 0.0005 kt 138.4 kt 138.4 kt Monaco
1980s 4.4 kt 116.8 kt 112.4 kt Monaco
1990s 9.9 kt 102.07 kt 92.17 kt Monaco
2000s 11 kt 90.35 kt 79.35 kt Monaco
2010s 11.74 kt 77.05 kt 65.31 kt Monaco
2020s 15.62 kt 58.85 kt 43.23 kt Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Monaco?
Monaco, at 52 kt against 15 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Monaco?
37 kt, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Monaco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Monaco rank globally for energy — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 197th and Monaco ranks 196th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Monaco: Energy — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/monaco/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Monaco: Energy — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf