Chile vs Serbia: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,862 kt against 1,831 kt in Serbia, a difference of 31 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 109th of 229 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,150 kt | 1,835 kt | 1,315 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | 2,976 kt | 1,836 kt | 1,140 kt | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,958 kt | 1,924 kt | 33.6 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 1,862 kt against 1,831 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Chile and Serbia?
- 31 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Chile ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 109th of 229 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf