Chile vs South Sudan: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,862 kt against 1,812 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 50 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 90th and South Sudan ranks 92nd of 199 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,967 kt | 1,915 kt | 1,052 kt | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,958 kt | 1,816 kt | 141.4 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 1,862 kt against 1,812 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Chile and South Sudan?
- 50 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Chile ranks 90th and South Sudan ranks 92nd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf