Ecuador vs Sudan: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8,344 kt against 7,896 kt in Sudan, a difference of 448 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 61st of 229 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,418 kt | 7,284 kt | 2,135 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 8,407 kt | 8,015 kt | 392 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 8,344 kt against 7,896 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 448 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Ecuador ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 61st of 229 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf