Rwanda vs South Sudan: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 1,812 kt against 1,767 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 45 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 113th and South Sudan ranks 110th of 229 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,535 kt | 1,915 kt | 379.4 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,756 kt | 1,816 kt | 60.2 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 1,812 kt against 1,767 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 45 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Rwanda ranks 113th and South Sudan ranks 110th of 229 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf