Antigua and Barbuda vs Costa Rica: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.0014 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
167th
Costa Rica rank
169th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Costa Rica
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0014 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 167th and Costa Rica ranks 169th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Costa Rica?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0014 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Costa Rica?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Costa Rica rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 167th and Costa Rica ranks 169th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Costa Rica: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/costa-rica/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Costa Rica: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.