Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre

Congo
0.039 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0359 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.039 kt per square kilometre against 0.0359 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0031 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Congo ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0045 kt per square kilometre 0.0075 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0145 kt per square kilometre 0.0101 kt per square kilometre 0.0044 kt per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.027 kt per square kilometre 0.0277 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0358 kt per square kilometre 0.0351 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0386 kt per square kilometre 0.0367 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0395 kt per square kilometre 0.0362 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?
Congo, at 0.039 kt per square kilometre against 0.0359 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0031 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.