Belarus vs Costa Rica: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0023 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.0022 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
84th
Costa Rica rank
87th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Costa Rica
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0023 kt per square kilometre against 0.0022 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 84th and Costa Rica ranks 87th of 185 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Costa Rica?
Belarus, at 0.0023 kt per square kilometre against 0.0022 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Costa Rica?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 84th and Costa Rica ranks 87th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Costa Rica: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/costa-rica/">Belarus vs Costa Rica: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.