British Virgin Islands vs Eswatini: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

British Virgin Islands
0.003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0029 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
British Virgin Islands rank
72nd
Eswatini rank
73rd

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • Eswatini
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

British Virgin Islands currently reports 0.003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0029 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 72nd and Eswatini ranks 73rd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, British Virgin Islands averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre British Virgin Islands
2020s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, British Virgin Islands or Eswatini?
British Virgin Islands, at 0.003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0029 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between British Virgin Islands and Eswatini?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do British Virgin Islands and Eswatini rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
British Virgin Islands ranks 72nd and Eswatini ranks 73rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs Eswatini: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/british-virgin-islands/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/british-virgin-islands/eswatini/">British Virgin Islands vs Eswatini: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.