Central African Republic vs Chad: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
185th
Chad rank
183rd

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
0000196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.9 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 185th and Chad ranks 183rd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Chad in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Chad?
Chad, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Chad?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 185th and Chad ranks 183rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Chad: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/chad/">Central African Republic vs Chad: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.