Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
0.0041 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
57th
Uganda rank
59th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uganda
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0041 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 57th and Uganda ranks 59th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0026 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Uganda?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0041 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 57th and Uganda ranks 59th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.