Iceland vs Mauritania: Energy — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Iceland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
181st
Mauritania rank
184th

Energy — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
000000196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Mauritania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 181st and Mauritania ranks 184th of 185 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Iceland or Mauritania?
Iceland, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Iceland and Mauritania?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for energy — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 181st and Mauritania ranks 184th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Energy — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Energy — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,671 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.