Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Ecuador: Energy — Emissions per capita

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
3.01 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Ecuador
3 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
113th
Ecuador rank
114th

Energy — Emissions per capita over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Ecuador
11.522.533.5199020062023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 3.01 t CO2eq/cap against 3 t CO2eq/cap in Ecuador, a difference of 0.01 t CO2eq/cap.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 113th and Ecuador ranks 114th of 221 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 1.57 t CO2eq/cap 2.39 t CO2eq/cap 0.812 t CO2eq/cap Ecuador
2000s 2.05 t CO2eq/cap 2.52 t CO2eq/cap 0.472 t CO2eq/cap Ecuador
2010s 2.29 t CO2eq/cap 2.93 t CO2eq/cap 0.646 t CO2eq/cap Ecuador
2020s 3.08 t CO2eq/cap 2.72 t CO2eq/cap 0.3525 t CO2eq/cap Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions per capita, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Ecuador?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 3.01 t CO2eq/cap against 3 t CO2eq/cap in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions per capita between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Ecuador?
0.01 t CO2eq/cap, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Ecuador rank globally for energy — emissions per capita?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 113th and Ecuador ranks 114th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Ecuador: Energy — Emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-per-capita/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-per-capita/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/ecuador/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Ecuador: Energy — Emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions per capita
Unit
t CO2eq/cap
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 8,378 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.