Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Panama: Energy — Emissions per capita

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
3.01 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Panama
3.03 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
102nd
Panama rank
101st

Energy — Emissions per capita over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Panama
11.522.533.5199020062023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 3.03 t CO2eq/cap against 3.01 t CO2eq/cap in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.02 t CO2eq/cap.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 102nd and Panama ranks 101st of 190 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 1.57 t CO2eq/cap 1.58 t CO2eq/cap 0.002 t CO2eq/cap Panama
2000s 2.05 t CO2eq/cap 2.04 t CO2eq/cap 0.015 t CO2eq/cap Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 2.29 t CO2eq/cap 2.64 t CO2eq/cap 0.355 t CO2eq/cap Panama
2020s 3.08 t CO2eq/cap 2.75 t CO2eq/cap 0.32 t CO2eq/cap Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions per capita, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Panama?
Panama, at 3.03 t CO2eq/cap against 3.01 t CO2eq/cap in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions per capita between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Panama?
0.02 t CO2eq/cap, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Panama?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Panama rank globally for energy — emissions per capita?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 102nd and Panama ranks 101st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Panama: Energy — Emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-per-capita/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-per-capita/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/panama/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Panama: Energy — Emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions per capita
Unit
t CO2eq/cap
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 7,974 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.